In the spirit of Christmas, I thought it fitting to put one of my personal pet peeves to the “sin” test.
“Re-gifting” is the practice of giving a person a present that you previously received as a present. It is a good way to save money on gifts. It also sends a clear message to the person you received the gift from that this is not the kind of present that you wish to receive again, especially if they are there when the “re-gift” is opened.
I have begun the practice of giving gifts that cannot be “re-gifted”, by placing the name of the individual somewhere on the gift (the only way to “re-gift” that is to find someone else named Bob).
While, I have a high dislike for this practice, does it qualify as a sin? Here are the facts:
- Regifting was featured in an episode of Seinfeld as a horrid practice, earning the offending party the heinous title of “regifter”.
- In 1 Chronicles 21, King David is given the chance to “regift” a burnt offering to the Lord. He responds, in verse 24, by saying, “I will not offer that which costs me nothing.”
- Oprah is a well-known regifter, but has specific rules for regifting, including re-wrapping the present and remembering who you first got the gift from, so as not to regift to the original giver.
- The Environmental Protection Agency has declared “regifting” to be “green gifting”, helping to prevent additional waste product and thus preventing global warming trends.
- The book of Leviticus offers various instructions for the transfer of property. One of the chief rules is that the property must have been “purchased for a tangible cost”. Sounds like a strike against regifting to me.
So, I stand by my original thought. Re-gifting must be a sin.
What do you think? Is this a sin? Cast your vote now.